50,000+ Reviewed · Honest Dupes · Find Your Scent →
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Luna Rossa Carbon vs Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum

Which should you buy? Full side-by-side breakdown of notes, performance, seasons, value, and our verdict.

QUICK VERDICT

These two are closely matched on performance and price. The decision comes down to note preference: Luna Rossa Carbon leans fresher and more warm-weather-friendly, while Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum leans the other way. Pick based on the season and mood you'll wear it most.

PERFORMANCE METRICS

78/100
Longevity
80/100
68/100
Sillage
78/100
65%
Day Wear
50%
35%
Night Wear
50%
35%
Spring
25%
30%
Summer
20%
20%
Autumn
30%
15%
Winter
25%
125
Value (lower price wins)
118
Luna Rossa Carbon
Top
Bergamot, Lavender
Heart
Coal (Metallic Accord), Pepper
Base
Patchouli, Ambroxan
Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum
Top
Lavender, Chili Pepper, Bergamot
Heart
Orange Blossom, Neroli
Base
Amber, Patchouli, Cedarwood
Shared Notes (3)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Is Luna Rossa Carbon or Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum better?
These two are closely matched on performance and price. The decision comes down to note preference: Luna Rossa Carbon leans fresher and more warm-weather-friendly, while Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum leans the other way. Pick based on the season and mood you'll wear it most.
Which lasts longer, Luna Rossa Carbon or Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum?
Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum lasts longer. Luna Rossa Carbon is rated moderate to long lasting (6h - 8h) while Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum is rated long lasting (7h - 10h).
Do Luna Rossa Carbon and Guilty Pour Homme Eau de Parfum smell similar?
They share 3 notes: Bergamot, Lavender, Patchouli. There is meaningful overlap in their character.

AdeGbe is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site we may earn an affiliate commission from retailers such as Amazon, FragranceNet, Sephora, and Lookfantastic. This never affects the price you pay, and it never influences our reviews, scores, or rankings — our editorial verdicts are independent.